🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.